Notes
Outline
PsychRights’ Legal Campaign Against Forced Drugging and How You Can Participate
James B. Gottstein, Esq.
Law Project for Psychiatric Rights
jim@psychrights.org
The Legal Setting:
Involuntary Commitment
Forced Medication
The Reality
Involuntary Commitment Standards
1.  Mentally Ill,
and
A Danger to Self or Others,
or, (in some states)
3.  Gravely Disabled (not sanctioned by US Supreme Court)
Forced Medication Standards
State Laws may define Federal Rights (Mills v. Rogers)
Incompetent to Decline (Refuse)
“Professional Judgment” (Youngberg v. Romeo/Rennie v. Klein)
“Best Interests”
Where Junk Science Comes In
“Substituted Judgment”
“Least Restrictive Alternative”
The Reality
Courts accept . . . testimonial dishonesty, . . . specifically where witnesses, especially expert witnesses, show a "high propensity to purposely distort their testimony in order to achieve desired ends."  . . .
Experts frequently . . . and openly subvert statutory and case law criteria that impose rigorous behavioral standards as predicates for commitment   . . .
This combination  . . . helps define a system in which  (1) dishonest testimony is often regularly (and unthinkingly) accepted; (2) statutory and case law standards are frequently subverted; and (3) insurmountable barriers are raised to insure that the allegedly "therapeutically correct" social end is met . . ..  In short, the mental disability law system often deprives individuals of liberty disingenuously and upon bases that have no relationship to case law or to statutes.
The ADA and Persons with Mental Disabilities:  Can Sanist Attitudes Be Undone? by Michael L. Perlin, Journal of Law and Health, 1993/1994, 8 JLHEALTH 15, 33-34.
“The Reason:”
“Traditionally, lawyers assigned to represent state hospital patients have failed miserably in their mission”
Houston Law Review January, 1991 Health Law Issue COMPETENCY, DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION, AND HOMELESSNESS: A STORY OF MARGINALIZATION Michael L. Perlin
The Reason Behind the Reason: Society Demands It
Even if we agree with what you (Bob Whitaker) are saying, we won’t be allowed to do what you suggest.
Reaction of Alaska Psychiatric Institute psychiatrists to Bob Whitaker’s presentation.
What to Do
Public Education
Alternatives
Serious, Coordinated Legal Attack on Science
Public Education
Historic Opportunity
SSRI Debacle
The Fraudulent Science is Now Known
The Damage Has Been Documented
Natural Allies
AHRP
MindFreedom
PsychRights
ICSPP
NARPA
ISPS, Aspire, Drug Awareness
Others?
Alternatives Are Essential
Constitutional Right to Least Restrictive Alternative Meaningless without them.
PsychRights Efforts
System Change legal challenges
Selective Representation
Assistance for cases
Consulting
Briefing
Expert Witness Fees
Referrals
Experts
Attorneys
Technical Assistance
Website Materials
Expert Witnesses
Absolutely Critical
Need to Pay
Identify
Some Specific PsychRights Efforts
Myers Forced Drugging Case in Alaska
Child case in North Carolina
“Rogers Orders” in Massachusetts
Psychotropic Induced Homicide in Utah
Many unfulfilled requests
Montana, Nebraska, Ill., Texas, Minn, Mass. . . .
PPRA Form Letter
ICMHP Letter
Forced Drugging in Prison Case
Threatened Informed  Consent Case
Ways to Participate
Expert Witnesses
Alternative Treatment Options
Action Conference in DC end of April/beginning of May
Volunteers
Grant Writing
Webmastering??
Research,Organizing, Office
Other
$$$$ (of course)
Carpe Diem
Thank You For Coming